Junction City Community College

Project overview

  • Project: Online class registration platform — end-to-end student registration, search, and admin workflows

  • Role: Senior UX Designer — led research, information architecture, interaction design, prototyping, usability testing, and handoff to engineering and registrar team

  • Timeline: 10 weeks (discovery → prototypes → usability testing → development handoff → launch)

  • Team: Product Owner (Registrar), IT Lead, Front-end Dev, Back-end Dev, QA, Enrollment Services, Content Strategist

Context Junction City Community College (JCCC) previously had no online registration system; students registered in person or by phone, creating long lines, high staff load, and missed enrollment opportunities. The college needed an accessible, easy-to-use online registration platform to serve new and returning students, streamline admin workflows, and improve enrollment conversion.

Problem

  • No online registration: students forced to call or visit campus, causing friction and missed enrollments.

  • Course discovery was difficult: students struggled to find classes by topic, schedule, or program.

  • Administrative burden: staff handled manual enrollments, corrections, and reconciliation across systems.

  • New student onboarding and repeat registrations were time-consuming and error-prone.

Goals & success metrics

  • Launch a reliable online registration platform within academic term timeline

  • Increase online registrations to 60%+ of total enrollments within 6 months

  • Reduce phone/in-person registration volume by 50% within 90 days

  • Cut admin processing time per enrollment by 40%

  • Improve first-time student completion of registration flow (goal completion rate) to 75%

My approach

  1. Stakeholder alignment

    • Workshops with Registrar, Enrollment Services, Financial Aid, and IT to map requirements, compliance, and integration needs (Xenegrade/ SIS).

  2. UX research

    • Contextual interviews with students (new, returning, working adults) and enrollment staff.

    • Shadowed front-desk registration and phone support during peak enrollment windows.

    • Audit of existing materials: course catalogs, PDFs, schedules, and manual admin workflows.

  3. Synthesis & personas

    • Created 4 personas: New Student (first-time), Returning Student (part-time), Working Adult, Enrollment Admin — mapped goals and critical tasks.

  4. Information architecture & flows

    • Designed search-first course discovery: free-text + filters (term, day/time, modality, credits, instructor).

    • Built clear course detail pages with seat availability, prerequisites, fees, and direct “Add to Cart / Register” action.

    • Designed student dashboard: in-progress enrollment, holds, financial summary, and required actions.

    • Admin workflows: sync events for SIS, manual sync fallback, analytics for 0-result searches and search popularity.

  5. Prototyping & testing

    • Low → high-fidelity prototypes for desktop and mobile; moderated usability tests with students and admins.

    • Iterated on search behavior, cart-to-checkout flow, and error/hold resolution paths.

  6. Handoff & implementation

    • Delivered design system snippets, interaction specs, accessibility notes, and an analytics event map for tracking funnel metrics and sync events.

UX Research — methods & findings Methods

  • Contextual interviews: 18 students across segments + 6 enrollment staff

  • Field observation: front-desk and phone registration during peak enrollment

  • Usability testing: 16 participants (desktop + mobile), task-based on prototypes

  • Analytics planning: event map for search, add-to-cart, checkout, holds, and SIS syncs

Key findings

  • Discovery friction: students used inconsistent terminology; synonyms and program names caused many 0-result searches.

  • Task drop-off: students abandoned registration when holds (financial, prerequisites) weren’t clearly explained or resolvable online.

  • Mobile-first need: many students attempted registration on phones; desktop-only flows increased abandonment.

  • Admin pain: manual syncs to SIS created delays; no emergency “hijack” workflow when SIS was down.

  • Trust & clarity: students needed clear next steps, deadlines, and fee visibility before completing checkout.

Design solutions

  • Search-first interface: tolerant search with synonyms and suggested corrections; filters for term, delivery mode, day/time, credits.

  • Course detail & quick-register: clear seat counts, prerequisites, fees, and “Register” CTA with inline hold checks.

  • Cart & checkout flow: progressive disclosure of holds, immediate guidance (how-to-resolve hold) and ability to proceed to waitlist where allowed.

  • Mobile-responsive UI: optimized for touch inputs and one-handed use; persistent CTA to resume registration from dashboard.

  • Admin sync & fallback workflows: automated SIS sync events plus manual-triggered sync and a “hijack” mode to queue registrations when SIS is unavailable.

  • Analytics & admin tools: dashboards for 0-result searches, search popularity, registration funnels, and reconciliation exports.

Measured outcomes (post-launch / pilot results)

  • Online registrations: reached 64% of enrollments within 6 months

  • Phone/in-person volume: reduced by 58% within 90 days

  • Admin processing time: reduced by 45% per enrollment through automated syncs and clearer self-service holds resolution

  • Registration completion (first-time flow): 78% goal completion rate in usability cohort improvements

  • Reduced 0-result searches by 70% after implementing search synonyms and suggestions

  • Time-to-register: average end-to-end registration time dropped from ~18 minutes (in-person/phone) to under 6 minutes online

Deliverables

  • High-fidelity desktop & mobile prototypes (Figma)

  • Personas and prioritized task matrix

  • IA and detailed user flows (search → course → register → checkout)

  • Admin sync & fallback workflow diagrams

  • Usability test report with prioritized fixes

  • Analytics event map and KPI dashboard (registrations, holds, searches)

  • Handoff package: component specs, accessibility checklist, and dev tickets

Learnings & impact

  • A search-first experience that handles synonyms and program language significantly improves discovery and reduces abandonment.

  • Explicit hold resolution steps and visibility reduce manual admin handling and speed student completion.

  • Supporting mobile-first flows is critical for community college populations.

  • Building fallback admin syncs (manual trigger/hijack) ensures continuity during SIS downtime and prevents enrollment loss.

View Website
Previous
Previous

CLC Lodging

Next
Next

Structura